HRTechNews.com » You discriminated — and I have the e-mail to prove it

You discriminated — and I have the e-mail to prove it

October 20, 2008 by Sam Narisi
Posted in: Document retention, Security and law, Special Report
Share/Bookmark

Do your managers know how to avoid writing e-mails that lead to huge legal trouble? Here’s an example of some supervisors who learned the hard way.

A 62-year-old employee was fired and believed it was because of her age.

According to the company, she was fired for poor performance. The woman had been placed on a performance improvement plan (PIP), and her manager kept a record of her weaknesses dating back several months before the termination.

But when the employee took the company to court, the judge ruled in her favor. Why?

The decision hinged on one piece of evidence: e-mails sent between two of the company’s managers before the employee was placed on the PIP.

According to the judge, the e-mails made it clear the bosses wanted to fire her before there were any documented problems. First, one manager suggested letting her go in a reduction-in-force. The second felt that would open the door to a lawsuit and recommended making it a “performance issue.”

Once that evidence came up in court, the judge ruled age was the real reason she was fired.

E-mail creates permanent evidence

The lesson in this case for your managers: Everything they say in an e-mail is recorded — permanently.

Sensitive issues like terminations should never be discussed over e-mail. If an employee sues, those messages will end up in court — and there’s no telling how judges will interpret what they read.

Cite: Parks v. Lebhar-Friedman, Inc.

View all the Latest Stories

Tags: , ,

4 Responses to “You discriminated — and I have the e-mail to prove it”

  1. Mike Says:

    Sounds like the judge in this case interpreted it correctly. Rather than stating that the lesson is to refrain from using email for issues like termination, perhaps you should state that the lesson is to refrain from illegal discrimination.

  2. Judith Says:

    Mike is Right On!! Dicrimination is discrimination, whether it’s in an email, over the phone or beside the water cooler. We all know the rules & expect others to follow them.

  3. RHH Says:

    I couldn’t agree more with the comments. Documentation is a good thing, but only if it is compliant with the laws. Otherwise, it does more harm than good. An additional note: with today’s economic woes, the number of resumes I receive have quadrupled; and I’m sad to say that I estimate that 90% of those are people not just over 40, but over 50 as well (I can tell because so many of them include historical information and letters of reference dating back to the 70s and 80s). Most are “laid off.” I have to wonder if their age played a role in their termination.

  4. R. B. Says:

    Mike, you said it so well! Discrimination SHOULD be illegal and companies who do it SHOULD have to pay. It sounds like this one turned out right and that justice was served. I’m glad they got caught. So many times, this isn’t the case.

Leave a Reply


advertisement

advertisement

See what readers are saying...

  • Karl: People need to get real. If you want a really great position then you need to reflect on who you are, and what you do in...
  • Richard Getz: I can not believe what I am hearing. How is FB different then the phone, or the pub, or anyplace else people talk about ...
  • Jim Holloway: Well, at least she didn't just leave it on the train. The UK’s cyber security issues and “strategy for cyber security” w...
  • Celia68: This blog has been very informative. I am looking forward to the feedback on my situation. I was out on unexpected med...
  • HRMel: This is absolutely insane. I agree with Sean Smith. If you have access to a profile because your searched it that's fi...
  • John: You are correct. There is no federal requirement for break time or rest breaks. But if employers allow rest breaks, thos...