HRTechNews.com » Who won this case? She gave confidential info to her lawyer

Who won this case? She gave confidential info to her lawyer

August 5, 2008 by Sam Narisi
Posted in: Document retention, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views, Security and law
Share/Bookmark

An employee is fired for handing out sensitive information. What if she sues for retaliation, claiming she gave the documents to her lawyer while involved in a lawsuit against the company?

The facts:

An employee was involved in a class action suit against the company involving a pay discrimination claim. The attorney representing the plaintiffs asked the employee to send any and all documents related to the case so they could be submitted as evidence. For some unexplained reason, the docs the employee sent included confidential information about the company’s customers. When the company found out, it fired her for violating its privacy policy. She sued for retaliation, claiming she was fired because of her involvement in the equal pay suit.

The employer said:

The termination wasn’t retaliatory. The documents she turned over had nothing to do with the lawsuit, and by releasing them, she posed a threat to the customers’ privacy.

Who won the case?

Answer: The employer.

Why: The court ruled that just because she was participating in a lawsuit while she turned over the documents didn’t mean she was protected from discipline when breaking the company’s privacy policy.

Since releasing them was completely unnecessary and unrelated to the lawsuit, firing her for doing it couldn’t have been considered illegal retaliation,

Cite: Niswander v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.

View all the Latest Stories

Tags: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply


advertisement

advertisement

See what readers are saying...

  • Karl: People need to get real. If you want a really great position then you need to reflect on who you are, and what you do in...
  • Richard Getz: I can not believe what I am hearing. How is FB different then the phone, or the pub, or anyplace else people talk about ...
  • Jim Holloway: Well, at least she didn't just leave it on the train. The UK’s cyber security issues and “strategy for cyber security” w...
  • Celia68: This blog has been very informative. I am looking forward to the feedback on my situation. I was out on unexpected med...
  • HRMel: This is absolutely insane. I agree with Sean Smith. If you have access to a profile because your searched it that's fi...
  • John: You are correct. There is no federal requirement for break time or rest breaks. But if employers allow rest breaks, thos...