<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The OT violation most companies overlook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrtechnews.com/the-new-way-e-mail-can-get-you-sued/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/the-new-way-e-mail-can-get-you-sued/</link>
	<description>HRMS, Internet Monitoring, Payroll Software, Time and Attendance, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:58:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary B</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/the-new-way-e-mail-can-get-you-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=192#comment-370</guid>
		<description>Sam,

Re Miranda&#039;s question above, I have a similar question, only to do with with a non-exempt employee.  This person has often put an hour or an hour and a half down as Sick Leave, then went ahead and worked 8 or 9 hours that day, so we ended up paying her for from 9 to 10.5 hours, although the additional hours were at the regular pay rate, rather than the overtime rate.  Do we have to (or can we) write a policy to not pay this employee for the sick time over and above 8 hours (or their regular work day duration, in the case of part-time employees)?  We do not have a formal flex-time policy, but regularly allow employees to work any schedule that works best for them, as long as they work their full scheduled amount of hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam,</p>
<p>Re Miranda&#8217;s question above, I have a similar question, only to do with with a non-exempt employee.  This person has often put an hour or an hour and a half down as Sick Leave, then went ahead and worked 8 or 9 hours that day, so we ended up paying her for from 9 to 10.5 hours, although the additional hours were at the regular pay rate, rather than the overtime rate.  Do we have to (or can we) write a policy to not pay this employee for the sick time over and above 8 hours (or their regular work day duration, in the case of part-time employees)?  We do not have a formal flex-time policy, but regularly allow employees to work any schedule that works best for them, as long as they work their full scheduled amount of hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/the-new-way-e-mail-can-get-you-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=192#comment-302</guid>
		<description>What if you are a non-exempt employee who is on call 24/7 but the employer pays his/her cell phone bill. Now from the website at the top it says that if you are on call but not on premises and are able to do personal things then it is not working hours. But if you use the phone then it is? and if you have to do work after hours then you should get paid for hours worked. (am i understanding this correctly)? how do you determine the hours? (is it a full days pay or should the employee keep track of it?) This all goes back to the employer paying the cell phone bill is that correct in being used as compensation for time worked after hours? I was always under the impression that if you were salary the employer could work you after 40hrs and wouldn&#039;t have to pay you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if you are a non-exempt employee who is on call 24/7 but the employer pays his/her cell phone bill. Now from the website at the top it says that if you are on call but not on premises and are able to do personal things then it is not working hours. But if you use the phone then it is? and if you have to do work after hours then you should get paid for hours worked. (am i understanding this correctly)? how do you determine the hours? (is it a full days pay or should the employee keep track of it?) This all goes back to the employer paying the cell phone bill is that correct in being used as compensation for time worked after hours? I was always under the impression that if you were salary the employer could work you after 40hrs and wouldn&#8217;t have to pay you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/the-new-way-e-mail-can-get-you-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=192#comment-281</guid>
		<description>Sam,

I am an exempt employee with my company based on my title being a staff accountant.  I have worked for this company for two years now and prior to here recently if I took time off and during the week and happened to worked over 8 hours I only used the amount of sick or vacation time I needed to show 40 hours. This is standard practice within my company. Suddenly it is a problem for the exempt employees within my department only. They are saying that even though I worked 39.50 hours for the week that I must take 5 hours sick time for one day that I left early.  Can they do this? 

Thank you,

Miranda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam,</p>
<p>I am an exempt employee with my company based on my title being a staff accountant.  I have worked for this company for two years now and prior to here recently if I took time off and during the week and happened to worked over 8 hours I only used the amount of sick or vacation time I needed to show 40 hours. This is standard practice within my company. Suddenly it is a problem for the exempt employees within my department only. They are saying that even though I worked 39.50 hours for the week that I must take 5 hours sick time for one day that I left early.  Can they do this? </p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>Miranda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Narisi</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/the-new-way-e-mail-can-get-you-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=192#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Terry,

Nonexempt employees must be paid time and half for overtime hours (any hours worked beyond 40 each week). As for what makes someone exempt or nonexempt, the factors are too numerous to describe here, but you can that info from the Department of Labor here:

http://www.dol.gov/esa/regs/compliance/whd/fairpay/fact_exemption.htm

Sam Narisi
Editor
HRTechNews.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry,</p>
<p>Nonexempt employees must be paid time and half for overtime hours (any hours worked beyond 40 each week). As for what makes someone exempt or nonexempt, the factors are too numerous to describe here, but you can that info from the Department of Labor here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dol.gov/esa/regs/compliance/whd/fairpay/fact_exemption.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.dol.gov/esa/regs/compliance/whd/fairpay/fact_exemption.htm</a></p>
<p>Sam Narisi<br />
Editor<br />
HRTechNews.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/the-new-way-e-mail-can-get-you-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 17:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=192#comment-127</guid>
		<description>what are the differences between exempt and nonexempt ee&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what are the differences between exempt and nonexempt ee&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology creates another FLSA trap &#124; HRTechNews.com</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/the-new-way-e-mail-can-get-you-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology creates another FLSA trap &#124; HRTechNews.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 10:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=192#comment-121</guid>
		<description>[...] written about the legal issues caused when nonexempt employees carry technical devices and work at home. But [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written about the legal issues caused when nonexempt employees carry technical devices and work at home. But [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Narisi</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/the-new-way-e-mail-can-get-you-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=192#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Sandy,

The DOL doesn&#039;t require employees to be paid for the time they spend traveling to the normal place of business when responding to a call. They do need to be paid, however, for traveling to other locations (like a customer&#039;s place of business).

That said, some companies elect to pay for travel time, or have a set minimum that must be paid  to avoid resentment that might occur if an employee spends, say, an hour traveling round trip to do 15 minutes of paid work.

Sam Narisi
Editor
HRTechNews.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy,</p>
<p>The DOL doesn&#8217;t require employees to be paid for the time they spend traveling to the normal place of business when responding to a call. They do need to be paid, however, for traveling to other locations (like a customer&#8217;s place of business).</p>
<p>That said, some companies elect to pay for travel time, or have a set minimum that must be paid  to avoid resentment that might occur if an employee spends, say, an hour traveling round trip to do 15 minutes of paid work.</p>
<p>Sam Narisi<br />
Editor<br />
HRTechNews.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Narisi</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/the-new-way-e-mail-can-get-you-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=192#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Lou,

Only government employers are allowed to offer the choice of &quot;comp time&quot; (time off for overtime hours, instead of overtime pay). All other employers must pay time and a half for any and all overtime worked.

Sam Narisi
Editor
HRTechNews.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lou,</p>
<p>Only government employers are allowed to offer the choice of &#8220;comp time&#8221; (time off for overtime hours, instead of overtime pay). All other employers must pay time and a half for any and all overtime worked.</p>
<p>Sam Narisi<br />
Editor<br />
HRTechNews.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Narisi</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/the-new-way-e-mail-can-get-you-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=192#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Excellent point about exempt employees.

An exempt employee has to be paid for the full day if her or she does any work that day. Taking time to reply would likely mean that an entire day&#039;s worth of pay is due, even though the employee was supposed to be on unpaid leave.

Hope that helps.

Sam Narisi
Editor
HRTechNews.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Excellent point about exempt employees.</p>
<p>An exempt employee has to be paid for the full day if her or she does any work that day. Taking time to reply would likely mean that an entire day&#8217;s worth of pay is due, even though the employee was supposed to be on unpaid leave.</p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
<p>Sam Narisi<br />
Editor<br />
HRTechNews.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/the-new-way-e-mail-can-get-you-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 22:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=192#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Sam,

How does the use of Technology affect &quot;time Worked&quot; for Exempt employees?
For example, would an Exempt employee have to be paid for a full day worked when they took off for a personal reason, but replied to e-mails for about 10 minutes? [Assuming employee had no Paid Time Off available to use]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam,</p>
<p>How does the use of Technology affect &#8220;time Worked&#8221; for Exempt employees?<br />
For example, would an Exempt employee have to be paid for a full day worked when they took off for a personal reason, but replied to e-mails for about 10 minutes? [Assuming employee had no Paid Time Off available to use]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

