<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HR Tech News &#187; recruitment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrtechnews.com/tag/recruitment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com</link>
	<description>HRMS, Internet Monitoring, Payroll Software, Time and Attendance, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:10:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>5 reasons to consider outsourcing some HR functions</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/5-reasons-you-want-to-outsource-some-hr-functions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrtechnews.com/5-reasons-you-want-to-outsource-some-hr-functions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recruitment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obviously, companies need an in-house HR presence. But that doesn&#8217;t mean outsourcing some administrative functions is always a bad idea. Could it work for your company? Here are five signs that it might be worth a try: Deadlines are missed&#8211; If employees aren&#8217;t getting critical documents &#8212; like W-2s, paychecks, health care information, etc. &#8212; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, companies need an in-house HR presence. But that doesn&#8217;t mean outsourcing some administrative functions is always a bad idea. Could it work for your company? <span id="more-400"></span></p>
<p>Here are five signs that it might be worth a try:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Deadlines are missed&#8211; </strong>If employees aren&#8217;t getting critical documents &#8212; like W-2s, paychecks, health care information, etc. &#8212; on time, it might be a good idea to have an outside provider perform some of those administrative tasks.</li>
<li><strong>Recruiting doesn&#8217;t get enough focus &#8212; </strong>One of the benefits of outsourcing is that it lets HR pros use their talents in ways that really benefit the company, like finding and hiring the best talent.</li>
<li><strong>HR staffers are angry &#8212; </strong>No one likes to work in a department that can&#8217;t get all its work done. If that describes your team, you could have a big retention problem soon.</li>
<li><strong>Employee relations are suffering &#8212; </strong>Again, administrative work often gets in the way of what HR is really there for &#8212; keeping employees happy and productive.</li>
<li><strong>Everyone&#8217;s on the same page about what to outsource &#8212; </strong>Companies often report less than satisfactory results when outsiders handle critical functions like recruiting and training and development. That&#8217;s why its important for HR and top brass to come up with a plan that lets HR remain a strategic partner within the company.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrtechnews.com/5-reasons-you-want-to-outsource-some-hr-functions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

