<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HR Tech News &#187; ID theft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrtechnews.com/tag/id-theft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com</link>
	<description>HRMS, Internet Monitoring, Payroll Software, Time and Attendance, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:10:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Who won this case? She gave confidential info to her lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/who-won-this-case-she-was-fired-for-giving-the-wrong-docs-to-her-lawyer-was-it-retaliation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrtechnews.com/who-won-this-case-she-was-fired-for-giving-the-wrong-docs-to-her-lawyer-was-it-retaliation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 10:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Document retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security and law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensitive documents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An employee is fired for handing out sensitive information. What if she sues for retaliation, claiming she gave the documents to her lawyer while involved in a lawsuit against the company? The facts: An employee was involved in a class action suit against the company involving a pay discrimination claim. The attorney representing the plaintiffs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An employee is fired for handing out sensitive information. What if she sues for retaliation, claiming she gave the documents to her lawyer while involved in a lawsuit against the company?  <span id="more-295"></span></p>
<p><strong>The facts: </strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>An employee was involved in a class action suit against the company involving a pay discrimination claim. The attorney representing the plaintiffs asked the employee to send any and all documents related to the case so they could be submitted as evidence. For some unexplained reason, the docs the employee sent included confidential information about the company&#8217;s customers. When the company found out, it fired her for violating its privacy policy. She sued for retaliation, claiming she was fired because of her involvement in the equal pay suit.</p>
<p><strong>The employer said: </strong></p>
<p>The termination wasn&#8217;t retaliatory. The documents she turned over had nothing to do with the lawsuit, and by releasing them, she posed a threat to the customers&#8217; privacy.</p>
<p><strong>Who won the case?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Answer: </strong>The employer.</p>
<p><strong>Why: </strong>The court ruled that just because she was participating in a lawsuit while she turned over the documents didn&#8217;t mean she was protected from discipline when breaking the company&#8217;s privacy policy.</p>
<p>Since releasing them was completely unnecessary and unrelated to the lawsuit, firing her for doing it couldn&#8217;t have been considered illegal retaliation,</p>
<p><strong>Cite: </strong><em>Niswander v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrtechnews.com/who-won-this-case-she-was-fired-for-giving-the-wrong-docs-to-her-lawyer-was-it-retaliation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>States mandate protection of employee data</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/state-mandates-policies-to-protect-employee-data/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrtechnews.com/state-mandates-policies-to-protect-employee-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security and law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee data protection bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social security numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a new trend in state law: mandatory data protection policies. Connecticut has just passed such a law, becoming the second state (after Michigan) to do so. What does the new rule require? All employers must: create and post policy regarding social security numbers (the law doesn&#8217;t say what the policy needs to contain &#8212; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a new trend in state law: mandatory data protection policies. <span id="more-287"></span></p>
<p>Connecticut has just passed such a law, becoming the second state (after Michigan) to do so.</p>
<p>What does the new rule require? All employers must:</p>
<ul>
<li>create and post policy regarding social security numbers<strong> </strong>(the law doesn&#8217;t say what the policy needs to contain &#8212; just that it must keep social security data confidential and limit access to employees&#8217; SSNs)</li>
<li>safeguard against the misuse of &#8220;personal information&#8221; by third parties, and</li>
<li>destroy personal info once it&#8217;s no longer needed and properly erase and dispose of electronic storage media that the company gets rid of.</li>
</ul>
<p>Companies can be fined up to $5,000 dollars for intentional violations &#8212; those that they break the law unintentionally seem to be off the hook.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll keep you posted as more states consider similar bills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrtechnews.com/state-mandates-policies-to-protect-employee-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scammers target the generous</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/scammers-target-the-generous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrtechnews.com/scammers-target-the-generous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security and law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mail scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID theft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thinking about sending a donation to the earthquake victims in China? Here&#8217;s one way you don&#8217;t want to do it: The FBI has just released a warning about a new e-mail scam going around. Apparently, folks are asking for donations to help victims of the recent earthquake in China &#8212; and using the info they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking about sending a donation to the earthquake victims in China? Here&#8217;s one way you <em>don&#8217;t </em>want to do it: <span id="more-271"></span></p>
<p>The FBI has just released a warning about a new e-mail scam going around. Apparently, folks are asking for donations  to help victims of the recent earthquake in China &#8212; and using the info they get to carry out identity thefts.</p>
<p>To stay safe from this and other scams, the FBI recommends:</p>
<ul>
<li>Never respond to unsolicited e-mail.</li>
<li>Be skeptical of any organization that communicates via unsolicited e-mail.</li>
<li>Make donations directly to recognized organizations.</li>
<li>Don&#8217;t provide personal or financial information to anyone asking for donations &#8212; they probably don&#8217;t need it.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrtechnews.com/scammers-target-the-generous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What piece of paper do ID thieves want?</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/what-piece-of-paper-are-id-thieves-going-after/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrtechnews.com/what-piece-of-paper-are-id-thieves-going-after/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 10:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security and law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shredding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W-2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a lot of talk about identity thieves stealing electronic data. But they can still find plenty of what they need in hard copy, too. What pieces of paper is causing a lot trouble? Answer: undeliverable W-2s. IRS regs require companies to keep undeliverable W-2s for four years. That means after a few years, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot of talk about identity thieves stealing electronic data. But they can still find plenty of what they need in hard copy, too. <span id="more-261"></span></p>
<p>What pieces of paper is causing a lot trouble? Answer: undeliverable W-2s.</p>
<p>IRS regs require companies to keep undeliverable W-2s for four years. That means after a few years, the documents quickly pile up &#8212; often in boxes &#8212; and it can be hard to keep all that paper secure.</p>
<p>One solution many companies are turning to: scanning the docs into electronic files and shredding the originals.</p>
<p>That puts all the forms in once place without taking up any physical space, and makes it easier to keep them secure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrtechnews.com/what-piece-of-paper-are-id-thieves-going-after/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The latest ID theft scam</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/the-latest-id-theft-scam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrtechnews.com/the-latest-id-theft-scam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 10:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security and law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidential data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mail scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a new e-mail scam targeting you and your employees. Here&#8217;s how to identify it when it lands in your inbox. What&#8217;s the latest method fraudsters have for extracting victims&#8217; personal information? Pretending to be the IRS. A rash of phony e-mails have been appearing lately that claim to be from the tax agency. Typically [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a new e-mail scam targeting you and your employees. Here&#8217;s how to identify it when it lands in your inbox. <span id="more-253"></span></p>
<p>What&#8217;s the latest method fraudsters have for extracting victims&#8217; personal information?</p>
<p>Pretending to be the IRS.</p>
<p>A rash of phony e-mails have been appearing lately that claim to be from the tax agency. Typically they ask the recipients for Social Security numbers or bank account info, saying they need it to properly process refund checks.</p>
<p>Other scams tell readers they&#8217;re being investigate for tax fraud and ask them to click a link for more information &#8212; but doing so installs a virus on the victim&#8217;s computer.</p>
<p>The government warns people to be suspicious of all e-mails claiming to be from the IRS, because</p>
<ol>
<li>the agency doesn&#8217;t typically commuting through unsolicited e-mails, and</li>
<li>they wouldn&#8217;t ask taxpayers for secret, personal information.</li>
</ol>
<p>The IRS asks that phony e-mails be forwarded to phishing@irs.gov</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrtechnews.com/the-latest-id-theft-scam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

