<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HR Tech News &#187; employment authorization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrtechnews.com/tag/employment-authorization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com</link>
	<description>HRMS, Internet Monitoring, Payroll Software, Time and Attendance, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:10:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>E-Verify: Will it die or become mandatory under Obama?</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/e-verify-will-it-die-or-become-mandatory-under-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrtechnews.com/e-verify-will-it-die-or-become-mandatory-under-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applicant background screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security and law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment authorization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A rule issued by the federal government requiring many employers to use the E-Verify employment verification system is scheduled to take effect on January 15. But a pending lawsuit claims the rule is against the law. The rule, issued by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), will require most employers with federal contracts to use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-236" title="computers-connected" src="http://www.hrtechnews.com/wp-content/uploads/computers-connected.jpg" alt="computers-connected" width="360" height="256" /></p>
<p>A rule issued by the federal government requiring many employers to use the E-Verify employment verification system is scheduled to take effect on January 15. But a pending lawsuit claims the rule is against the law. <span id="more-517"></span></p>
<p>The rule, issued by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), will require most employers with federal contracts to use E-Verify for new hires, as well as current employees assigned to work on new contracts.</p>
<p>Covered employees included those with contracts valued at more than $120,000, lasting longer than 120 days and involving work done in the U.S.</p>
<p>A coalition of business groups, including the Society for Human Resource Management and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, filed a lawsuit at the end of last month to block the regulation. They claim E-Verify was enacted as a strictly voluntary program, and that requiring companies to use it violates the law Congress passed to authorize it.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll keep you posted on the outcome of the suit. For now, though, the rule&#8217;s effective date has been pushed back to Feb. 20.</p>
<p><strong>State mandates<br />
</strong></p>
<p>E-Verify is already mandatory for some or all employers in 11 states:  Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina and Utah.</p>
<p>The laws vary from state to state: Some only apply to companies that contract with the state government, while the mandates in Arizona, Mississippi, Missouri and South Carolina apply to all companies.</p>
<p>Arizona&#8217;s rule was recently challenged by businesses and immigration advocacy groups, but it was upheld in court.</p>
<p><strong>Will E-Verify last?</strong></p>
<p>Meanwhile, the future of the E-Verify program itself is uncertain.</p>
<p>Funding was set to expire last November, before Congress extended it until March 6. That was after a five-year extension was passed by a wide margin in the House of Representatives but failed to make it through the Senate.</p>
<p>President-elect Obama has expressed support for E-Verify. We&#8217;ll keep you posted on whether that translates into another extension for the program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrtechnews.com/e-verify-will-it-die-or-become-mandatory-under-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

