<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HR Tech News &#187; documentation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrtechnews.com/tag/documentation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com</link>
	<description>HRMS, Internet Monitoring, Payroll Software, Time and Attendance, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:10:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Manager didn&#8217;t document, now firm pays 46.6 mil</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/manager-didnt-document-now-firm-pays-466-mil/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrtechnews.com/manager-didnt-document-now-firm-pays-466-mil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security and law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctored]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time-stamped]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verdict]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know the drill: Document, document, document. But managers don&#8217;t always follow that drill. And a recent case shows the damages a company can face when if a manager doesn&#8217;t keep current documentation. An employee was asked to fire three workers in his department. He refused &#8212; they were all around 60 years old, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-17" title="Payroll software" src="http://hrtechnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/payroll-software.jpg" alt="" width="360" height="200" /></p>
<p>You know the drill: Document, document, document. But managers don&#8217;t always follow that drill. And a recent case shows the damages a company can face when if a manager doesn&#8217;t keep current documentation. <span id="more-299"></span></p>
<p>An employee was asked to fire three workers in his department. He refused &#8212; they were all around 60 years old, and he believed the firings would constitute age discrimination.</p>
<p>The company fired him soon after, citing performance reasons. He sued for retaliation.</p>
<p>The timing already looked bad enough for the company, but here&#8217;s the kicker: Without documentation to support the employee&#8217;s poor performance, his manager tried to make up his own paper trail after the termination.</p>
<p>In court, the company submitted as evidence an e-mail sent to the employee from his boss, criticizing his performance. The problem was, as a court computer expert discovered, the e-mail was actually written two weeks after the lawsuit was filed and doctored to look like it was older.</p>
<p>The case went before an Ohio jury, which decided in the employee&#8217;s favor and awarded him the biggest verdict in Ohio history. The final price tag: $3.5 million for the employee&#8217;s lost wages and a whopping $43.1 million in punitive damages for tampering with the evidence.</p>
<p><strong>No doctored documentation<br />
</strong></p>
<p>If an employee has performance problems, but there&#8217;s no written proof, many managers might not think twice before writing something down later. But as this case shows, phony documentation is often worse than no documentation at all.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s can HR do? Regularly remind managers about the importance of having timely documentation &#8212; and help them understand that if they don&#8217;t, there isn&#8217;t much they can do about it.</p>
<p>Few things look worse to a judge or jury than evidence being destroyed or created once a company finds out it&#8217;s being sued.</p>
<p><strong>Cite: </strong><em>Luri v. Republic Services of Ohio, LLC</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrtechnews.com/manager-didnt-document-now-firm-pays-466-mil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

