<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HR Tech News &#187; camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrtechnews.com/tag/camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com</link>
	<description>HRMS, Internet Monitoring, Payroll Software, Time and Attendance, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:10:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Did cameras violate employees&#8217; privacy?</title>
		<link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/did-cameras-violate-employees-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrtechnews.com/did-cameras-violate-employees-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security and law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=1662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When trying to catch an employee breaking the rules, is it possible to infringe on the privacy of other employees? That&#8217;s the question at the center of this court fight: Two women in California are suing their employer after discovering a hidden camera in an office they shared. They claim the company invaded their privacy. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When trying to catch an employee breaking the rules, is it possible to infringe on the privacy of other employees? <span id="more-1662"></span></p>
<p>That&#8217;s the question at the center of this court fight:</p>
<p>Two women in California are suing their employer after discovering a hidden camera in an office they shared. They claim the company invaded their privacy.</p>
<p>The employer&#8217;s explanation:</p>
<p>The company discovered that someone had been viewing pornography after hours on the women&#8217;s computers, so it installed a camera in the office.</p>
<p>The women weren&#8217;t suspected of wrong-doing, but they also weren&#8217;t told about the camera. The company claimed it was only turned on at night and never captured the women on film. In addition, the employer argued the employees had no reason to expect privacy while at work.</p>
<p>A California court agreed the women&#8217;s privacy was never compromised because they were never actually filmed. But that decision was overturned on appeal when a judge ruled the <em>possibility </em>that the woman could be watched was enough to let the case move forward.</p>
<p>Now, the state Supreme Court has agreed to hear the suit. We&#8217;ll keep you posted.</p>
<p><strong>Cite: </strong><em>Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrtechnews.com/did-cameras-violate-employees-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

