HRTechNews.com » Study: More e-mails mean the company’s doomed

Study: More e-mails mean the company’s doomed

July 2, 2009 by Sam Narisi
Posted in: Communication, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views, Uncategorized
Share/Bookmark

The way e-mail’s used says a lot about a company’s culture. But can e-mail patterns predict that a company’s about to go belly-up?

That’s what researchers at the Florida Institute of Technology say in a recent report. They looked at e-mail records at Enron in the months leading up to the company’s demise. Here’s what they found:

A month before the collapse, the number of “active e-mail cliques” — defined as groups in which every member has had direct e-mail contact with every other member — jump from about 100 to almost 800. Also, messages within those groups became more frequent but were sent to employees outside the group less often, the New Scientist reports.

The researchers say it’s a characteristic behavior in organizations experiencing a crisis — employees speak more often with co-workers they know, and withhold information with those they don’t.

“Human resources folk would probably find this extremely useful,” says Gilbert Peterson of the Air Force Institute of Technology in Dayton, Ohio, who has also studied Enron’s e-mails.

Some problems, though: Enron’s a pretty special case, and what happened there may not be indicative of what would happen at other companies.

And there are probably easier ways to sniff out discontent among employees than a complex analysis of their e-mail habits.

View all the Latest Stories

Tags: ,

One Response to “Study: More e-mails mean the company’s doomed”

  1. Brian Says:

    Another indication is a major decrease in the amount of incoming e-mails and phone calls.

Leave a Reply


advertisement

advertisement

See what readers are saying...

  • Richard Getz: I can not believe what I am hearing. How is FB different then the phone, or the pub, or anyplace else people talk about ...
  • Jim Holloway: Well, at least she didn't just leave it on the train. The UK’s cyber security issues and “strategy for cyber security” w...
  • Celia68: This blog has been very informative. I am looking forward to the feedback on my situation. I was out on unexpected med...
  • HRMel: This is absolutely insane. I agree with Sean Smith. If you have access to a profile because your searched it that's fi...
  • John: You are correct. There is no federal requirement for break time or rest breaks. But if employers allow rest breaks, thos...
  • mike R: I am unaware of a DOL requirement under the FLSA that entitles an employee to a 30 minute break if they work 6 hours. I...