<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: A trick to stop e-mail embarrassment</title> <atom:link href="http://www.hrtechnews.com/stop-sending-e-mails-before-theyre-ready/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/stop-sending-e-mails-before-theyre-ready/</link> <description>News and advice from the intersection of tech and HR</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:24:33 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Kitty</title><link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/stop-sending-e-mails-before-theyre-ready/comment-page-1/#comment-4253</link> <dc:creator>Kitty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:48:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=454#comment-4253</guid> <description>Thanks everybody....I did as Ian and William suggested, and the deferred rule is now set up.  I also agree with Cheryl re the suggestion to NOT fill in the recipient until after the message is reviewed....this definitely cuts down on errors.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks everybody&#8230;.I did as Ian and William suggested, and the deferred rule is now set up.  I also agree with Cheryl re the suggestion to NOT fill in the recipient until after the message is reviewed&#8230;.this definitely cuts down on errors.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cheryl</title><link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/stop-sending-e-mails-before-theyre-ready/comment-page-1/#comment-4248</link> <dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:01:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=454#comment-4248</guid> <description>People think I take way too much time to send an email - I reread it as well as run spell check, and then read it again. And not filling in the recipient field until the message is ready to send also helps cut down on sending something you will regret. I don&#039;t use Outlook and am not sure if my email client has a similar rule available - but learning to review BEFORE you hit send rather than after is not a bad thing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People think I take way too much time to send an email &#8211; I reread it as well as run spell check, and then read it again. And not filling in the recipient field until the message is ready to send also helps cut down on sending something you will regret. I don&#8217;t use Outlook and am not sure if my email client has a similar rule available &#8211; but learning to review BEFORE you hit send rather than after is not a bad thing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kitty</title><link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/stop-sending-e-mails-before-theyre-ready/comment-page-1/#comment-4237</link> <dc:creator>Kitty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:49:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=454#comment-4237</guid> <description>Ian - Thanks so much....I&#039;ll do that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian &#8211; Thanks so much&#8230;.I&#8217;ll do that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/stop-sending-e-mails-before-theyre-ready/comment-page-1/#comment-4232</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:13:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=454#comment-4232</guid> <description>Email Defer is great,  but you must check the box this machine only and your see the defer text.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Email Defer is great,  but you must check the box this machine only and your see the defer text.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ian</title><link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/stop-sending-e-mails-before-theyre-ready/comment-page-1/#comment-4231</link> <dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:53:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=454#comment-4231</guid> <description>This article points out a cool tool but is seriously lacking on the correct steps for the novice.
You must click Next and then Yes to assign this rule to all messages you send. Then you will see the option to defer sending and then follow the prompts to assign the time frame and continue on to name and enable the rule.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article points out a cool tool but is seriously lacking on the correct steps for the novice.<br
/> You must click Next and then Yes to assign this rule to all messages you send. Then you will see the option to defer sending and then follow the prompts to assign the time frame and continue on to name and enable the rule.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: william krupinsky</title><link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/stop-sending-e-mails-before-theyre-ready/comment-page-1/#comment-4226</link> <dc:creator>william krupinsky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:05:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=454#comment-4226</guid> <description>It works. Kitty did not go far enough.  It is not the next box as implied in the instructions. Just keep going &quot;next&quot; and read carefully.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It works. Kitty did not go far enough.  It is not the next box as implied in the instructions. Just keep going &#8220;next&#8221; and read carefully.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kitty</title><link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/stop-sending-e-mails-before-theyre-ready/comment-page-1/#comment-4225</link> <dc:creator>Kitty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=454#comment-4225</guid> <description>EXCELLENT!!!  I think this is a great idea because in the past I have accidentally clicked &#039;send&#039; before I verified everything.  But....there is a problem with your suggestion - when I tried to set up the suggested &#039;rule&#039; above, there was no “Defer delivery by a number of minutes” to select in the &#039;select conditions&#039; menu after “Check messages after sending/Next&quot;.  I use Outlook in Office 2003 on Windows XP.  Any suggestions???</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EXCELLENT!!!  I think this is a great idea because in the past I have accidentally clicked &#8217;send&#8217; before I verified everything.  But&#8230;.there is a problem with your suggestion &#8211; when I tried to set up the suggested &#8216;rule&#8217; above, there was no “Defer delivery by a number of minutes” to select in the &#8217;select conditions&#8217; menu after “Check messages after sending/Next&#8221;.  I use Outlook in Office 2003 on Windows XP.  Any suggestions???</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/16 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp03.pbp.com @ 2010-09-10 22:55:28 -->