<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Ready for new COBRA rules? Here&#8217;s help</title> <atom:link href="http://www.hrtechnews.com/ready-for-new-cobra-rules-heres-help/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/ready-for-new-cobra-rules-heres-help/</link> <description>News and advice from the intersection of tech and HR</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:24:33 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: P. Baldree</title><link>http://www.hrtechnews.com/ready-for-new-cobra-rules-heres-help/comment-page-1/#comment-6765</link> <dc:creator>P. Baldree</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:49:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrtechnews.com/?p=1106#comment-6765</guid> <description>I have read these docs and thought this was great until I got to the part about the former employee not being eligible for assistance if they were eligible under their spouse&#039;s insurance (which in one case was far higher).  Am I incorrect in assuming that they are not eligible?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read these docs and thought this was great until I got to the part about the former employee not being eligible for assistance if they were eligible under their spouse&#8217;s insurance (which in one case was far higher).  Am I incorrect in assuming that they are not eligible?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/10 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp06.pbp.com @ 2010-03-16 16:23:57 -->