HRTechNews.com » Feds cracking down on 4 E-Verify mistakes

Feds cracking down on 4 E-Verify mistakes

September 29, 2008 by Sam Narisi
Posted in: Applicant background screening, Security and law, Special Report
Share/Bookmark

As more employers are being forced to use the federal government’s E-Verify system to check the authorization of new hires, HR pros are asking one serious question: Are there any legal risks involved in participation?

First, the good news: The Department of Homeland Security recently assured employers they wouldn’t be held liable if they use E-Verify correctly, and an undocumented worker gets hired anyway.

For example, the worker may be using someone else’s name and social security number — the system won’t know something’s wrong, since it will just verify that the name and SSN match.

In those cases, says Homeland Security Secretary Micheal Chertoff, the company will not be punished — employers are only liable when they knowingly hire unauthorized workers.

Using E-Verify the right way

So if companies get some protection when they use E-Verify correctly, how can HR pros make sure the tool’s not being used the wrong way?

Here are the big E-Verify rules companies must follow, according to the DHS:

  • Notify potential hires — Participating employers must post signs at their hiring sites — in English and Spanish — informing potential employees that they use E-Verify. Notices from the DHS are available in the “Online Resources” section of E-Verify.
  • Verify new hires only — The system cannot be used to check the authorization of current employees or to pre-screen potential hires before an offer is made. Verification must take place after an employee fills out an I-9 and no later than three days after his or her start date.
  • Use it consistently — E-Verify must be used for all new hires. Checking on specific people because a manager’s suspicious about their immigration status is one easy way to end up with a bias claim.
  • Don’t act too quickly — If a name and SSN don’t match, you will get a Tentative Nonconfirmation (TNC) — and the key word is “tentative.” Employees must be notified about the TNC as soon as possible, and they have eight business days to resolve the discrepancy by contacting the Social Security Administration. A TNC is never grounds for termination.

State law

Finally, companies should be familiar with all applicable state and local laws. Several states require companies to use E-Verify.

The laws range from mandates for all companies to rules that only apply to employers with government contracts. It’s important to know the ins and outs of the laws in your state.

View all the Latest Stories

Tags: , ,

2 Responses to “Feds cracking down on 4 E-Verify mistakes”

  1. LH Says:

    ” A TNC is never grounds for termination.”

    So what do you do on the 9th day when the employee has yet to fix the issue. Is it ok to terminate then?

  2. john king Says:

    Good Job US COC. These fn policies and laws are driving our economy into the ground. Go be racist somewhere else not on our labor and dime. Most of these e-verify zealots belong to groups like the K.K.K. This nonsense law needs to be stopped in its track. I am tired of our country being converted into a police state for the sake of racism. This law is designed to cause financial burden on indigent Americans, Asian Americans, African Americans and Hispanic Americans; just what K.K.K pundits would like to see. Our businesses cannot be tools to foster such hatred. I was actually solicited by K.K.K patrons requesting my business not to hire non-whites about 18 years ago. I am surprised to see now the government is at a forefront promoting and legalizing such policies publicly now. If Obama and his team falls for this crap shame on them. Because we worked so hard to vote for new leadership to stop such cruel, unnecessary, and racist laws that place burden on our economy, people, and our country in general.
    Thanks, COC. We would like to know how we could help donate time and effort to the cause

Leave a Reply


advertisement

advertisement

See what readers are saying...

  • Karl: People need to get real. If you want a really great position then you need to reflect on who you are, and what you do in...
  • Richard Getz: I can not believe what I am hearing. How is FB different then the phone, or the pub, or anyplace else people talk about ...
  • Jim Holloway: Well, at least she didn't just leave it on the train. The UK’s cyber security issues and “strategy for cyber security” w...
  • Celia68: This blog has been very informative. I am looking forward to the feedback on my situation. I was out on unexpected med...
  • HRMel: This is absolutely insane. I agree with Sean Smith. If you have access to a profile because your searched it that's fi...
  • John: You are correct. There is no federal requirement for break time or rest breaks. But if employers allow rest breaks, thos...