HRTechNews.com » Don’t ban this tech tool just yet …

Don’t ban this tech tool just yet …

August 1, 2008 by Sam Narisi
Posted in: Employee computer use, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views

Are workers being interrupted by phone calls, e-mails and visits from co-workers? Here’s a solution managers may not have tried:

Have them use instant messaging software on the job.

Contrary to popular belief, a new study finds that workers who “IM” report fewer interruptions than colleagues who do not. At the same time, they may feel more connected at the office.

Using instant messaging led to more conversations on the computer, but the conversations were briefer, says R. Kelly Garrett, assistant professor of communication at Ohio State University in Columbus, who co-authored the study with University of California, Irvine professor James N. Danziger.

Garrett says that employees using IM technology report that they communicate more frequently — with co-workers, clients, and personal contacts — but do not spend any more time communicating overall.

Employees often use the technology as a substitute for other, more disruptive forms of communication such as the telephone, e-mail, and face-to-face conversations, and IM conversations tend to be briefer, he says.

“The key takeaway is that instant messaging has some benefits where many people had feared that it might be harmful,” Garrett said. “We found that the effect of instant messaging is actually positive. People who used instant messaging reported that they felt they were being interrupted less frequently.”

The study involved 912 people from 12 metropolitan areas who worked at least 30 hours per week in an office and used a computer for at least five hours in a workday. The results were published recently in the Journal of Computer Mediated Communication.

Tags: , , , ,

3 Responses to “Don’t ban this tech tool just yet …”

  1. J L Zimmerman Says:

    This does not address the real threat that IM software presents. I am not convinced that it can easily be secured. There are more secure products out there, but they are not the IM products that users are used to using. This one is off the table in our shop, not because of productivity issues, but for security reasons.

  2. Judy E. Luttrell Says:

    I am probably the least computer literate person on the planet, but the article “Don’t ban this tech tool just yet …” sounded very intriguing. Could you direct me to any articles that define in basic layman’s terms exactly what is “instant messaging” and how it is different than using email. Does Instant Messaging require a special tool such as a Blackberry or Treo??

    Many thx for your patience with my questions !! –Judy–

  3. Robert Schumacher Says:

    If security is your issue then don’t open up your IM to the outside world. There are completely internal solutions available.

Leave a Reply


advertisement


advertisement

See what readers are saying...

  • Jim R: Shelley B got it right when she said it "only serves the sender and leaves the recipient feeling isolated and distrustfu...
  • Rick: I think it's a crying shame to give American jobs to third world companies. What are we doing to the USA and to the peop...
  • Justin: Interesting, 70% of sabatoge cases are 'normal people', maybe we should hire criminals......
  • Laura Lee: It doesn't surprise me but after the city of New London took residents' homes by eminent domain for Pfizer under the pre...
  • Nathan: If I got fired I would tell anyone anything. I wouldn't sabotage anything either....
  • GoodBoy: Doesn't this voilate the intended use of H1B visas? Which were to my understanding, allow companies to fill jobs for sk...