HRTechNews.com » 4 ways your cell phone is (allegedly) trying to kill you

4 ways your cell phone is (allegedly) trying to kill you

August 11, 2008 by Sam Narisi
Posted in: Employee computer use, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views

With all the ways cell phones are reported to cause health problems, who can keep track of them?

Computerworld writer Mike Elgan recently summarized the alleged threats. Here’s his list of the ways your cell phone is might be trying to cause you serious physical trauma:

  • Cancer — This one’s been tossed around for a while but got a second wind recently when the director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute sent a memo asking employees to limit cell phone use because of the possible cancer risk.
  • Traffic accidents — Even though many people would agree that using a phone while driving raises the risks, there are plenty of cases of accidents involving drivers talking — or even texting — while behind the wheel.
  • Child development problems — A survey by the Danish National Birth Cohort claims exposure to cell phone signals (before and after birth) raises the likelihood a child will suffer from hyperactivity and other behavioral and social problems.
  • Lightning strikes — Russian officials say cell phones are to blame for an increase in deaths caused by lightning. (The theory is that a cell phone in use will attract the bolt.)

Does any of this mean cell phone users (i.e., most likely you and all of your employees) are at risk and should stop?

It depends on who you ask. You can read Elgan’s take here.

The main problem: All of the claims are anecdotal — there aren’t any real numbers to back them up.

Tags: , , , ,

5 Responses to “4 ways your cell phone is (allegedly) trying to kill you”

  1. ATTCellPhones Says:

    I might buy the first 3 but the last one is silly. I will take my chances with the lightening one.

  2. Jeff Says:

    And what about the risk of setting off explosion if talking on cell while pumping gas. Haven’t heard much about this one lately, but a problem couple of years back.

  3. Frank Says:

    It’s irresponsible to post points 1,3, and 4 that unsubstantiated by modern science. The general consensus by scientists and researchers is that they don’t cause cancer, cause child development problems, or attract lightening bolts.

    Please write on topics that have a basis in fact, rather than speculation.

  4. Jim Holloway Says:

    What they didn’t show is the russian version of a cell phone. It has its own tower.

  5. Jane Says:

    Lighten up Frank

Leave a Reply


advertisement


advertisement

See what readers are saying...

  • Greg Nall: I strongly disagree with this article. I would venture to say that all municipalities have multiple free employment res...
  • Jim R: Shelley B got it right when she said it "only serves the sender and leaves the recipient feeling isolated and distrustfu...
  • Rick: I think it's a crying shame to give American jobs to third world companies. What are we doing to the USA and to the peop...
  • Justin: Interesting, 70% of sabatoge cases are 'normal people', maybe we should hire criminals......
  • Laura Lee: It doesn't surprise me but after the city of New London took residents' homes by eminent domain for Pfizer under the pre...
  • Nathan: If I got fired I would tell anyone anything. I wouldn't sabotage anything either....