HRTechNews.com » 3 good reasons to tighten tech policies now

3 good reasons to tighten tech policies now

May 23, 2008 by Sam Narisi
Posted in: Employee computer use, Security and law, Special Report

Have your managers ever had to fire someone for reading dirty Web sites or sending racy e-mails? If not, they might need to pay closer attention.

More than 50% of companies have had to fire employees for misusing e-mail or the Web, according to a recent survey by the American Management Association (AMA).

Most of the managers surveyed said porn or other inappropriate content was the culprit. Other cases just involved employees who were wasting too much time.

Same goes for e-mail — in many cases, employees were fired for using offensive language, while others were sending too many personal messages. Other employees were canned because they sent confidential info to the wrong people.

Keep a close watch?

One thing that mean: A lot of companies are watching what their employees are doing with their computers.

Why are they paying close attention? There are a few reasons companies monitor computer and e-mail use and strictly enforce policies. Three of the big ones:

  • Avoiding lawsuits - Companies have been sued for sexual harassment and discrimination because of the presence of pornography in the workplace, or because employees forwarded e-mails with racial or sexual jokes.
  • Conserving resources - Watching online videos or streaming music takes up valuable bandwidth and makes the Web slower for employees who are actually trying to do work.
  • Protecting against viruses - Stopping employees from visiting seedy Web sites or downloading content is one step toward keeping viruses off the company’s network.

There are also reasons companies avoid placing strict controls or monitoring use too closely. Obviously, some types of surfing have no place in the office. But many employers are reluctant to restrict all personal use as long as people are getting their jobs done.

What to do?

There’s no easy answer, but here are some things to consider when deciding how to handle employees and their computers:

HR and IT need to cooperate - IT doesn’t always the know the legal risks workplace technology poses, just as HR might not understand all the technical difficulties caused by excessive surfing. For a policy to work, the departments need to communicate with each other.

Managers need to watch performance - If someone’s wasting too much time online, it’s likely the symptom of a problem, rather than a problem in itself. Managers have to distinguish between employees who use the Internet to take a break from working hard, and those who use it to avoid working at all.

Complaints must be handled quickly - If someone brings a complaint about pornography or offensive e-mail, it must be dealt with immediately. Those are just as lawsuit-worthy as other forms of harassment, but can be even more dangerous since they create permanent electronic evidence.

Tags: , , ,

2 Responses to “3 good reasons to tighten tech policies now”

  1. Melanie Roney Says:

    I was wondering about company liability when offensive emails get through and delivered to an employee’s inbox. I can’t seem to find any literature or policies on the subject….only about employee’s improper use of internet and email. Can our company be held liable if an employee receives offensive emails from telemarketers that they employee did not solicit?

  2. Sam Narisi Says:

    Melanie,

    Generally, a company can only be held liable for harassment by a non-employee (a customer, vendor, etc.) if the company knows or should have know about the harassment and can prevent it, but fails to do so. If the emails are coming from a vendor the company has a relationship with, it may possible to take care of the problem. Otherwise, the only solution seems to be using a spam filter (which won’t eliminate all the emails), so it seems unlikely the company would be considered at fault.

    Sam Narisi
    Editor
    HRTechNews.com

Leave a Reply


advertisement


advertisement

See what readers are saying...

  • Greg Nall: I strongly disagree with this article. I would venture to say that all municipalities have multiple free employment res...
  • Jim R: Shelley B got it right when she said it "only serves the sender and leaves the recipient feeling isolated and distrustfu...
  • Rick: I think it's a crying shame to give American jobs to third world companies. What are we doing to the USA and to the peop...
  • Justin: Interesting, 70% of sabatoge cases are 'normal people', maybe we should hire criminals......
  • Laura Lee: It doesn't surprise me but after the city of New London took residents' homes by eminent domain for Pfizer under the pre...
  • Nathan: If I got fired I would tell anyone anything. I wouldn't sabotage anything either....